<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ICMCC &#187; Wikipedia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.icmcc.org/tag/wikipedia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.icmcc.org</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:06:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Free Wiki handbook on Medical Informatics and more: just out on Wikipedia in time for New Year&#8217;s</title>
		<link>http://articles.icmcc.org/2010/01/01/free-wiki-handbook-on-medical-informatics-and-more-just-out-on-wikipedia-in-time-for-new-years/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://articles.icmcc.org/2010/01/01/free-wiki-handbook-on-medical-informatics-and-more-just-out-on-wikipedia-in-time-for-new-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 16:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bioinformatics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.icmcc.org/2010/01/01/free-wiki-handbook-on-medical-informatics-and-more-just-out-on-wikipedia-in-time-for-new-years/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Wikipedia Handbook of Biomedical informatics is itself a gem &#8220;published&#8221; today, thanks to the wonderful new Web 2.0 world in which we live and in particular to the organizational  efforts of Pr Renato Sabbatini in Brazil. Read on for the reasons to not miss out on this one!&#8221;
Article
Denise Silber&#8217;s Blog, 31 December 2009
Handbook
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://articles.icmcc.org/2010/01/01/free-wiki-handbook-on-medical-informatics-and-more-just-out-on-wikipedia-in-time-for-new-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EMR, EHR and HIPAA Wiki</title>
		<link>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/09/16/emr-ehr-and-hipaa-wiki/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/09/16/emr-ehr-and-hipaa-wiki/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/09/16/emr-ehr-and-hipaa-wiki/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A while back I decided to take a weekend and create an EMR, EHR and HIPAA wiki to go alongside this website. I still think it&#8217;s a really good idea that still has yet to be full realized. That said, considering the relatively little amount of effort that I&#8217;ve put into the project, we&#8217;ve had [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/09/16/emr-ehr-and-hipaa-wiki/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Trouble with Wikipedia as a Source for Medical Information</title>
		<link>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/09/14/the-trouble-with-wikipedia-as-a-source-for-medical-information/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/09/14/the-trouble-with-wikipedia-as-a-source-for-medical-information/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-patient]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/09/14/the-trouble-with-wikipedia-as-a-source-for-medical-information/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Wikipedia is an admirable initiative. It is a large online collaborative, multilingual encyclopedia written by contributors around the world.
But the key question is whether you can rely on Wikipedia as the sole source for medical, scientific or even popular information.
Well, you simply can&#8217;t and here are a few examples/findings to substantiate this point.&#8221;
Article
Laika&#8217;s MedLibLog, 14 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/09/14/the-trouble-with-wikipedia-as-a-source-for-medical-information/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Educate, collaborate, share and network on HIMSS Clinical Decision Support Wiki</title>
		<link>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/08/03/educate-collaborate-share-and-network-on-himss-clinical-decision-support-wiki/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/08/03/educate-collaborate-share-and-network-on-himss-clinical-decision-support-wiki/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 17:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decision Support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIMSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meaningful Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/08/03/educate-collaborate-share-and-network-on-himss-clinical-decision-support-wiki/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Many organizations struggle to successfully deploy clinical decision support (CDS), a goal that takes on new importance since effective clinical decision support is a critical component of â€˜meaningful EMR use,&#8217; as required for stimulus funding under the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act.
Now, to help realize the promise of clinical decision support to enable meaningful EMR [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/08/03/educate-collaborate-share-and-network-on-himss-clinical-decision-support-wiki/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HIMSS launches clinical decision support wiki</title>
		<link>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/07/31/himss-launches-clinical-decision-support-wiki/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/07/31/himss-launches-clinical-decision-support-wiki/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decision Support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIMSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/07/31/himss-launches-clinical-decision-support-wiki/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Healthcare Information and Management Systems Soceity has deployed a new wiki to allow healthcare organizations to collaborate on realizing the full potential of clinical decision support solutions.
With CDS being a critical part of &#8220;meaningful use&#8221; criteria, implementation and proper use of the systems is expected to improve care delivery and diagnosis, lowering costs of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/07/31/himss-launches-clinical-decision-support-wiki/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NIH Gets Schooled on Wikipedia</title>
		<link>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/07/28/nih-gets-schooled-on-wikipedia/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/07/28/nih-gets-schooled-on-wikipedia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icmcc.org/2009/07/28/nih-gets-schooled-on-wikipedia/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Anyone who has used the Internet is likely familiar with Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia edited and run almost entirely by volunteers. Wikipedia is the Web&#8217;s most prominent source of information, but because of its crowd-sourcing model, it&#8217;s not always the most credible. That&#8217;s pretty much the opposite of federal Web sites, which are generally considered [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/07/28/nih-gets-schooled-on-wikipedia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medical research and social media: Can wikis be used as a publishing platform in medicine?</title>
		<link>http://science.icmcc.org/2009/07/27/medical-research-and-social-media-can-wikis-be-used-as-a-publishing-platform-in-medicine/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://science.icmcc.org/2009/07/27/medical-research-and-social-media-can-wikis-be-used-as-a-publishing-platform-in-medicine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 06:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icmcc.org/?p=10310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This past month marked an exciting development at Open Medicine: the launch of the Open Medicine wiki. The first publication to be housed on the wiki is a scoping review of studies examining the use of asynchronous telehealth by Deshpande and colleagues. The interactive article allows users to log in and edit, delete or add [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://science.icmcc.org/2009/07/27/medical-research-and-social-media-can-wikis-be-used-as-a-publishing-platform-in-medicine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Partenariat entre Wikipedia et le NIH, annoncé le 16 Juillet 2009</title>
		<link>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/07/20/partenariat-entre-wikipedia-et-le-nih-annonce-le-16-juillet-2009/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/07/20/partenariat-entre-wikipedia-et-le-nih-annonce-le-16-juillet-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 07:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icmcc.org/?p=10108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Prononcez le mot Wikipedia devant certaines personnes du secteur de la Santé et la fontaine de critiques se met en marche&#8230;.sauf que, devant le constat de son trafic immense (300 millions de visiteurs par mois), son nombre de pages (13,5 millions d&#8217;articles dans 250 langues) et un référencement Google imbattable, le NIH a décidé de [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/07/20/partenariat-entre-wikipedia-et-le-nih-annonce-le-16-juillet-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wikipedia isn&#8217;t really the patient&#8217;s friend</title>
		<link>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/07/15/wikipedia-isnt-really-the-patients-friend/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/07/15/wikipedia-isnt-really-the-patients-friend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icmcc.org/2009/07/15/wikipedia-isnt-really-the-patients-friend/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;I researched my condition on Wikipedia.&#8221; That&#8217;s what more doctors, myself included, are hearing from patients every day.
Wikipedia is the Web&#8217;s most popular online encyclopedia. Its more than 13 million articles cover almost every topic imaginable. It is among the most visited sites primarily because its articles routinely show up near the top of search [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/07/15/wikipedia-isnt-really-the-patients-friend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcoming medical research experts to Wikipedia</title>
		<link>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/07/15/welcoming-medical-research-experts-to-wikipedia/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/07/15/welcoming-medical-research-experts-to-wikipedia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icmcc.org/2009/07/15/welcoming-medical-research-experts-to-wikipedia/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Every day millions of people access health information online. We have recently seen some new hard evidence of Wikipedia&#8217;s growing prominence as a health information resource. The rapid development and traffic on the English Wikipedia of an article on the 2009 flu pandemic demonstrates this trend.
Since the pandemic broke out in April 2009, Wikipedia has [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/07/15/welcoming-medical-research-experts-to-wikipedia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NIH and Wikimedia Foundation Collaborate to Improve Online Health Information</title>
		<link>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/07/15/nih-and-wikimedia-foundation-collaborate-to-improve-online-health-information/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/07/15/nih-and-wikimedia-foundation-collaborate-to-improve-online-health-information/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 07:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icmcc.org/2009/07/15/nih-and-wikimedia-foundation-collaborate-to-improve-online-health-information/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The National Institutes of Health and the Wikimedia Foundation, the nonprofit organization that operates the WikipediaÂ® online encyclopedia, are joining forces to make health and science information more accessible and reliable. This collaboration is the first of its kind for both organizations.
&#8220;NIH works to ensure that the information it provides on science and health is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/07/15/nih-and-wikimedia-foundation-collaborate-to-improve-online-health-information/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wikipedia used by 70% of junior physicians, dominates search results for health queries</title>
		<link>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/07/09/wikipedia-used-by-70-of-junior-physicians-dominates-search-results-for-health-queries/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/07/09/wikipedia-used-by-70-of-junior-physicians-dominates-search-results-for-health-queries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 15:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icmcc.org/2009/07/09/wikipedia-used-by-70-of-junior-physicians-dominates-search-results-for-health-queries/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Study: Junior physician&#8217;s use of Web 2.0 for information seeking and medical education:
Google and Wikipedia used by 80% and 70% of physicians, respectively.
Wikipedia is a prominent source of online health information compared to the other online health info providers studied. Wikipedia ranked among first ten results in 71-85% of search engines and medical keywords tested. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/07/09/wikipedia-used-by-70-of-junior-physicians-dominates-search-results-for-health-queries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beyond Wikipedia</title>
		<link>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/05/25/beyond-wikipedia/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/05/25/beyond-wikipedia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 05:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icmcc.org/2009/05/25/beyond-wikipedia/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;No surprise, these days more and more doctors are searching online for medical information. What is surprising, however, is that in a recent study, nearly 50% of physicians indicated that they use Wikipediaâ€”the open-access encyclopedia that allows anyone to edit articlesâ€”as their source for medical information.
The study, conducted by Manhattan Research, and reported on here [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/05/25/beyond-wikipedia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medical information and the use of emerging technologies</title>
		<link>http://science.icmcc.org/2009/05/11/medical-information-and-the-use-of-emerging-technologies/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://science.icmcc.org/2009/05/11/medical-information-and-the-use-of-emerging-technologies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 17:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Add new tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Informatics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icmcc.org/?p=8602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this age of information technology, physicians are confronted daily with the dilemma of how to deal with an excess of medical information. To do this efficiently and effectively, it is important to be aware of new technologies and their application. This article introduces emerging technologies, highlighting some of the resources available and demonstrating how [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://science.icmcc.org/2009/05/11/medical-information-and-the-use-of-emerging-technologies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seeking health information online: does Wikipedia matter?</title>
		<link>http://science.icmcc.org/2009/04/30/seeking-health-information-online-does-wikipedia-matter/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://science.icmcc.org/2009/04/30/seeking-health-information-online-does-wikipedia-matter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icmcc.org/?p=8323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OBJECTIVE 
To determine the significance of the English Wikipedia as a source of online health information.
DESIGN 
We measured Wikipedia&#8217;s ranking on general Internet search engines by entering keywords from MedlinePlus, NHS Direct Online and the National Organization of Rare Diseases as queries into search engine optimization software. We assessed whether article quality influenced this ranking. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://science.icmcc.org/2009/04/30/seeking-health-information-online-does-wikipedia-matter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study suggests doctors could add to Wikipedia</title>
		<link>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/04/30/study-suggests-doctors-could-add-to-wikipedia/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/04/30/study-suggests-doctors-could-add-to-wikipedia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 05:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icmcc.org/?p=8313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Researchers are suggesting that doctors could be spending more time writing and editing Wikipedia pages on medical topics, despite questions that have been raised about the collaborative online encyclopedia&#8217;s credibility.
Medical professionals should recognize that Wikipedia has become a major online source of health information for consumers, researchers wrote in the Journal of the American Medical [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/04/30/study-suggests-doctors-could-add-to-wikipedia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health Care IT Slideshow: How Google, CDC, Twitter, Wikipedia Are Tracking Swine Flu</title>
		<link>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/04/29/health-care-it-slideshow-how-google-cdc-twitter-wikipedia-are-tracking-swine-flu/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/04/29/health-care-it-slideshow-how-google-cdc-twitter-wikipedia-are-tracking-swine-flu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disease Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social-network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icmcc.org/?p=8278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Whether or not it will evolve into a true pandemic, or merely a panic, the swine flu has dominated the news for the past several days. Social-networking tools, including Twitter, have been tracing the spread of the disease in near real time, while Google Flu Trends, a Web service provided by Google.org, and Wikipedia have [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/04/29/health-care-it-slideshow-how-google-cdc-twitter-wikipedia-are-tracking-swine-flu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taking the PulseÂ®</title>
		<link>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/04/27/taking-the-pulse%c2%ae/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/04/27/taking-the-pulse%c2%ae/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 06:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-prescribing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icmcc.org/?p=8212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Physicians and Emerging Information Technologies, is a syndicated multi-client physician research study and advisory service focused on understanding technology adoption and integration trends among U.S. practicing physicians. Now in its ninth year, the primary objective of the research study is to track which technologies physicians have adopted, how they are currently using them, and how [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/04/27/taking-the-pulse%c2%ae/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Médecins internautes européens : 4 enseignements clé de l&#8217;étude Manhattan Research</title>
		<link>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/04/27/medecins-internautes-europeens-4-enseignements-cle-de-letude-manhattan-research/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/04/27/medecins-internautes-europeens-4-enseignements-cle-de-letude-manhattan-research/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 06:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icmcc.org/?p=8210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Une enquÃªte de la société Manhattan Research chez les médecins européens de 5 grands pays, et rapportée par Biovalley présente plusieurs observations intéressantes. Comme d&#8217;habitude, ceci ne convaincra pas ceux qui pensent que les médecins français n&#8217;utilisent pas internet.&#8221;
Article (French) (English translation)
Denise Silber, Silber&#8217;s Blog, 26 April 2009
See also: Manhattan Research: Wikipedia consultation for healthcare [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/04/27/medecins-internautes-europeens-4-enseignements-cle-de-letude-manhattan-research/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Implementation of an onto-wiki toolkit using web services to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of medical ontology co-authoring and analysis</title>
		<link>http://science.icmcc.org/2009/03/23/implementation-of-an-onto-wiki-toolkit-using-web-services-to-improve-the-efficiency-and-effectiveness-of-medical-ontology-co-authoring-and-analysis/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://science.icmcc.org/2009/03/23/implementation-of-an-onto-wiki-toolkit-using-web-services-to-improve-the-efficiency-and-effectiveness-of-medical-ontology-co-authoring-and-analysis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICD-11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.icmcc.org/?p=7405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ICD11 draft was launched by the WHO in order to define ICD ontology by selected experts using a wiki-like structured joint-authoring tool. The challenge of this expert-/community-based ontology co-authoring is how to manage and process the ontology objects in the wiki page. The wiki-tools in the market require lots of time and human effort [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://science.icmcc.org/2009/03/23/implementation-of-an-onto-wiki-toolkit-using-web-services-to-improve-the-efficiency-and-effectiveness-of-medical-ontology-co-authoring-and-analysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medpedia: Who gets to say what info is reliable?</title>
		<link>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/02/25/medpedia-who-gets-to-say-what-info-is-reliable/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/02/25/medpedia-who-gets-to-say-what-info-is-reliable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[participatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patient]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icmcc.org/?p=6306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Unless you&#8217;ve been offline since last week, you know that Medpedia has gone into public beta. I have a concern about the reliability of their model, based on my personal experience and the self-education I&#8217;ve been doing for the past year. I want to lay out the concern, my reasons, and a proposal.&#8221;
Article
e-Patient Dave, The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/02/25/medpedia-who-gets-to-say-what-info-is-reliable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medpedia&#8217;s Wisdom of the Expert Crowd: The Best of Both Worlds or The Worst?</title>
		<link>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/02/23/medpedias-wisdom-of-the-expert-crowd-the-best-of-both-worlds-or-the-worst/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/02/23/medpedias-wisdom-of-the-expert-crowd-the-best-of-both-worlds-or-the-worst/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icmcc.org/?p=6265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;While I repeatedly criticized the excesses of Web 2.0 hype over the last two years, there was not much to rant about lately. The investment bubble popped, the expectations crashed down to earth and people generally sobered up.
That is why last week&#8217;s launch of Medpedia is so interesting and not just for bucking this downtrend. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/02/23/medpedias-wisdom-of-the-expert-crowd-the-best-of-both-worlds-or-the-worst/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The OpenMRS Implementers Network</title>
		<link>http://science.icmcc.org/2009/02/02/the-openmrs-implementers-network/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://science.icmcc.org/2009/02/02/the-openmrs-implementers-network/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Developing Countries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Informatics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icmcc.org/?p=11631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Objective
OpenMRS (www.openmrs.org) is a configurable open source electronic medical record application developed and maintained by a large network of open source developers coordinated by the Regenstrief Institute and Partners in Health and mainly used for HIV patient and treatment information management in Africa. Our objective is to develop an open Implementers Network for OpenMRS to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://science.icmcc.org/2009/02/02/the-openmrs-implementers-network/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wikpedia et la qualité de son information pharmaceutique ?</title>
		<link>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/01/29/wikpedia-et-la-qualite-de-son-information-pharmaceutique/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/01/29/wikpedia-et-la-qualite-de-son-information-pharmaceutique/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 06:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icmcc.org/?p=5620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Peut-on faire confiance à l&#8217;information médicamenteuse sur Wikipedia? Le premier mythe Web 2.0 du récent article dans le Journal du Net fait état de la difficulté de comparer de façon définitive, la qualité respective de Wikipedia et Encyclopedia Brittanica ; toutes encyclopédies comportent des erreurs et la qualité est fonction de la capacité de s&#8217;améliorer [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/01/29/wikpedia-et-la-qualite-de-son-information-pharmaceutique/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>European Physician Tech Tools of the Trade &#8211; Wikipedia and Social Networking?</title>
		<link>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/01/22/european-physician-tech-tools-of-the-trade-wikipedia-and-social-networking/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/01/22/european-physician-tech-tools-of-the-trade-wikipedia-and-social-networking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Information Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social-network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icmcc.org/?p=5384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Manhattan Research, a global healthcare and pharmaceutical market research company, today announced the release of Taking the Pulse(R) Europe v8.0, its European physician study and strategic advisory service. euIt offers in-depth market data and analysis of how physicians across Western Europe integrate the Internet and technology into their practises. Taking the Pulse(R) Europe also looks [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://articles.icmcc.org/2009/01/22/european-physician-tech-tools-of-the-trade-wikipedia-and-social-networking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Salupedia&#8217;, o la información que el paciente debería leer</title>
		<link>http://articles.icmcc.org/2008/12/23/salupedia-o-la-informacion-que-el-paciente-deberia-leer/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://articles.icmcc.org/2008/12/23/salupedia-o-la-informacion-que-el-paciente-deberia-leer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 06:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patient]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.icmcc.org/?p=4115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;El grupo de Tecnologías para la Salud y el Bienestar del Instituto Itaca de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia ha puesto en marcha la web www.salupedia.org, una nueva enciclopedia médica virtual que pretende aunar el esfuerzo de ciudadanos y profesionales de la salud.&#8221;
Article (Spanish) (English translation)
Diario Médico, 22 December 2008
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://articles.icmcc.org/2008/12/23/salupedia-o-la-informacion-que-el-paciente-deberia-leer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Communities about Healthcare and Information Technologies</title>
		<link>http://articles.icmcc.org/2008/12/22/communities-about-healthcare-and-information-technologies/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://articles.icmcc.org/2008/12/22/communities-about-healthcare-and-information-technologies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 06:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Information Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.icmcc.org/?p=4102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;L&#8217;association COMMHIT Communities about Healthcare and Information Technologies ou Communautés sur les activités de santé et les technologies de l&#8217;information.&#8221;
Article (French) (English translation)
Simon Letellier, Informatique Médicale,TIC &#038; Pharmacie, 20 December 2008
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://articles.icmcc.org/2008/12/22/communities-about-healthcare-and-information-technologies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The emerging Web 2.0 social software: an enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education</title>
		<link>http://science.icmcc.org/2008/12/18/the-emerging-web-20-social-software-an-enabling-suite-of-sociable-technologies-in-health-and-health-care-education/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://science.icmcc.org/2008/12/18/the-emerging-web-20-social-software-an-enabling-suite-of-sociable-technologies-in-health-and-health-care-education/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 06:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bibliography.icmcc.org/?p=10611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Web 2.0 sociable technologies and social software are presented as enablers in health and health care, for organizations, clinicians, patients and laypersons. They include social networking services, collaborative filtering, social bookmarking, folksonomies, social search engines, file sharing and tagging, mashups, instant messaging, and online multi-player games. The more popular Web 2.0 applications in education, namely [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://science.icmcc.org/2008/12/18/the-emerging-web-20-social-software-an-enabling-suite-of-sociable-technologies-in-health-and-health-care-education/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health 2.0 Wiki and People</title>
		<link>http://articles.icmcc.org/2008/12/05/health-20-wiki-and-people/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://articles.icmcc.org/2008/12/05/health-20-wiki-and-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 06:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.icmcc.org/?p=3940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;As an outgrowth of the Health 2.0 conference, there is a growing Health 2.0 wiki including some bios of Health 2.0 people. Obviously this listing is not comprehensive but then as an evolving field, Health 2.0 will always have a growing following. It is interesting to compare the definitions of Health 2.0 on this wiki [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://articles.icmcc.org/2008/12/05/health-20-wiki-and-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Developing a Pain Management Resource Wiki for Cancer Patients and Their Caregivers</title>
		<link>http://science.icmcc.org/2008/12/04/developing-a-pain-management-resource-wiki-for-cancer-patients-and-their-caregivers/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://science.icmcc.org/2008/12/04/developing-a-pain-management-resource-wiki-for-cancer-patients-and-their-caregivers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oncology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.icmcc.org/?p=10784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Utilizing Web 2.0 technologies such as blogs, wikis, and social networking sites can provide innovative and creative means to communicate with library patrons. They can also serve as a purposeful information repository for individuals looking for information on a particular topic. A pain management resource for cancer patients and their caregivers was created to provide [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://science.icmcc.org/2008/12/04/developing-a-pain-management-resource-wiki-for-cancer-patients-and-their-caregivers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cyberchondria: a short history, Microsoft&#8217;s systematic study, and Wikipedia could be health-risky</title>
		<link>http://articles.icmcc.org/2008/12/01/cyberchondria-a-short-history-microsofts-systematic-study-and-wikipedia-could-be-health-risky/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://articles.icmcc.org/2008/12/01/cyberchondria-a-short-history-microsofts-systematic-study-and-wikipedia-could-be-health-risky/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.icmcc.org/?p=3898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The concept of &#8220;cyberchondria&#8221; is not new. My first exposure to the term was through a study by Harris Interactive in 2002 which conducted a global cyberchondria study comparing health citizens online in the France, Germany, Japan and the U.S. The study defined cyberchrondriacs as &#8220;people who use the Internet for health purposes&#8221;.&#8221;
Article
Jane Sarasohn-Kahn, Health [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://articles.icmcc.org/2008/12/01/cyberchondria-a-short-history-microsofts-systematic-study-and-wikipedia-could-be-health-risky/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Would you trust WikiPedia with your life?</title>
		<link>http://articles.icmcc.org/2008/11/25/would-you-trust-wikipedia-with-your-life/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://articles.icmcc.org/2008/11/25/would-you-trust-wikipedia-with-your-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 19:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.icmcc.org/?p=3862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;And that is the bad news. How can we ever trust WikiPedia? How can you know that the information on the page you visit hasn&#8217;t been changed by information terrorists (or simply misinformed people) a few seconds ago? You should at least monitor the information on the page you read for a few days before [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://articles.icmcc.org/2008/11/25/would-you-trust-wikipedia-with-your-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wikipedia often omits important drug data</title>
		<link>http://articles.icmcc.org/2008/11/25/wikipedia-often-omits-important-drug-data/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://articles.icmcc.org/2008/11/25/wikipedia-often-omits-important-drug-data/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 19:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.icmcc.org/?p=3857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Consumers who rely on the user-edited Web resource Wikipedia for information on medications are putting themselves at risk of potentially harmful drug interactions and adverse effects, new research shows.&#8221;
Article
MSNBC, 25 November 2008
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://articles.icmcc.org/2008/11/25/wikipedia-often-omits-important-drug-data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>[Does WIKIPEDIA provide evidence-based health care information? A content analysis]</title>
		<link>http://science.icmcc.org/2008/10/14/does-wikipedia-provide-evidence-based-health-care-information-a-content-analysis/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://science.icmcc.org/2008/10/14/does-wikipedia-provide-evidence-based-health-care-information-a-content-analysis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence-based]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.icmcc.org/?p=11295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patients and consumers are increasingly searching the Internet for medical and healthcare information. Using the criteria of evidence-based medicine the present study analyses the websites of Wikipedia and two major German statutory health insurances for content and presentation of patient information. 22 senior students of health sciences and education evaluated one topic each. In a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://science.icmcc.org/2008/10/14/does-wikipedia-provide-evidence-based-health-care-information-a-content-analysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Logging On for a Second (or Third) Opinion</title>
		<link>http://articles.icmcc.org/2008/10/01/logging-on-for-a-second-or-third-opinion/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://articles.icmcc.org/2008/10/01/logging-on-for-a-second-or-third-opinion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 06:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.icmcc.org/?p=3347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;When Terri Nelson learned she had a large fibroid tumor in her uterus, she went online.
There is nothing new in that, of course. The intrepid and the adept were going to the Web for health information as long ago as the 1980s, well before Google and other search engines made it accessible to a wider [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://articles.icmcc.org/2008/10/01/logging-on-for-a-second-or-third-opinion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health 2.0 User-Generated Healthcare</title>
		<link>http://articles.icmcc.org/2008/08/14/health-20-user-generated-healthcare/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://articles.icmcc.org/2008/08/14/health-20-user-generated-healthcare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 06:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.icmcc.org/?p=3010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;How are Web 2.0 technologies like social networks, wikis and online communities changing the face of the health care industry? How are hospital systems and physician practices evolving as a result of rapid technological change?  How can health plans evolve in the face of emerging challenges with the help of new technologies and new thinking? [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://articles.icmcc.org/2008/08/14/health-20-user-generated-healthcare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medical Wikis: The Doctor Is Online</title>
		<link>http://articles.icmcc.org/2008/08/12/medical-wikis-the-doctor-is-online/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://articles.icmcc.org/2008/08/12/medical-wikis-the-doctor-is-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 06:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.icmcc.org/?p=2998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;With the rapid pace of development in medical technology, some doctors have turned to the Web to supplement textbooks and journals and created medical wikis. Naturally, wikis aren&#8217;t to be regarded as the final word on any medical topic; rather, they&#8217;re facilitators of discussion and starting-off points for more research.&#8221;
Article
Vivian Wagner, LinuxInsider, 8 August 2008
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://articles.icmcc.org/2008/08/12/medical-wikis-the-doctor-is-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health 2.0 &#8211; social networks and wikis</title>
		<link>http://articles.icmcc.org/2008/08/05/health-20-social-networks-and-wikis/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://articles.icmcc.org/2008/08/05/health-20-social-networks-and-wikis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 06:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social-network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.icmcc.org/?p=2957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Two of the types of tools which are mentioned when people talk about the idea of “Health 2.0″ are social networks and wikis.
Social networking sites are springing up fast and they all allow people suffering from the same disease to connect with each other for information sharing, telling their stories, giving each other emotional support [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://articles.icmcc.org/2008/08/05/health-20-social-networks-and-wikis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Description To Action: The Future of Health 2.0 Tools</title>
		<link>http://articles.icmcc.org/2008/07/28/from-description-to-action-the-future-of-health-20-tools/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://articles.icmcc.org/2008/07/28/from-description-to-action-the-future-of-health-20-tools/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.icmcc.org/?p=2895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Last week, The Health Care Blog ran two articles about new wiki sites that will develop and continuously update medical information. A wiki is a “content collaborative” that allows anyone (or anyone authorized by the site) to contribute or modify content; Wikipedia is the best known example.&#8221;
Article
Brian Klepper, The Health Care Blog, 28 July 2008
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://articles.icmcc.org/2008/07/28/from-description-to-action-the-future-of-health-20-tools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medical ‘Wikipedia’ Is Looking For a Few Good Doctors</title>
		<link>http://articles.icmcc.org/2008/07/26/medical-%e2%80%98wikipedia%e2%80%99-is-looking-for-a-few-good-doctors/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://articles.icmcc.org/2008/07/26/medical-%e2%80%98wikipedia%e2%80%99-is-looking-for-a-few-good-doctors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 05:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.icmcc.org/?p=2889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;An online medical encyclopedia launching later this year aims to have have the open-source, ever-evolving, comprehensive nature of Wikipedia. But — in a key departure from Wikipedia’s all-comers sensibility — the new encyclopedia will be edited only by those with advanced degrees in medicine and biomedical science.&#8221;
Article
Jacob Goldstein, WSJ Health Blog, 25 July 2008
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://articles.icmcc.org/2008/07/26/medical-%e2%80%98wikipedia%e2%80%99-is-looking-for-a-few-good-doctors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
